I don’t give a damn about your title, unless I know you earned it.
I don’t give a damn about what title you refer to me with, unless I know I’ve earned it.
Through an odd course of events, the topic of titles has come up repeatedly in multiple contexts in the last few weeks, and I’m actually kind of tired of it. I’ve had the tremendous honor of knowing multiple title holders, as well as a few wonderful people I know and respect the title that they carry. Master this, Sir that, Dame whatever, etc. are all titles that don’t mean a fucking thing to me simply because you decided that you can assume this title.
Let me make something very clear from the outset: time “in grade” is not the sole metric for having a title. If you’re one of those people that thinks simply because you’ve been in the lifestyle for X years that you’re now entitled to wear the honorific of whatever, then I’m afraid you haven’t got the qualifications for whatever title you wish to bestow upon yourself. There’s the old adage of 10,000 hours of practice makes one a Master, but I must definitely disagree. Practice does not make perfect, PERFECT practice makes perfect. You may have spent 10,000 hours in sweaty practice on whatever you’re practicing at, but if you’ve been putting in sloppy hours and half-hearted practice, I don’t give a damn about how long you spent.
Titles are earned. Not all honorifics are titles.
Sir -
This is the only honorific I demand, and only from those specifically in service to me. I demand it as a token of respect, as an honorific. I require those in service to me to behave with respect and courtesy towards those that deserve it. It is a sign of respect to refer to someone as sir or ma’am, and in the south most of us were raised to refer to someone as either ‘sir’ or ‘ma’am’ as a sign of polite discourse. If I happen to call you either of these things, it is because it has been ingrained in me since birth to be respectful of those around me, even when I’m not entirely certain that they deserve it.
The Title of “Sir” or “Dame” is different, in that it has been awarded by a seated monarch. Obviously, few of those in the lifestyle have been awarded such an honor by a monarch, but I tend to hold the bearers of such titles to a similar standard as set forth in the nomination procedure for the title:
making a difference to their community or field of workenhancing Britain’s reputationlong-term voluntary serviceinnovation and entrepreneurshipchanging things, with an emphasis on achievementimproving life for people less able to help themselvesdisplaying moral courage
In terms of the lifestyle, it is easy to see where the translation is. Instead of “Britain’s reputation”, I see it as “enhancing the lifestyle in general”, or “enhancing the reputation of X subset”
If I know someone has done all of these things, I see no issue with respecting their title of Sir or Dame.
In the Leather world, there are several procedures and protocols that go along with attaining the title of “Sir”, though I believe that many of them involve much of what is listed above. Since the majority of the Leather path involves service to the community, these titles are also ones that I greatly respect and honor.
Master -
This one is significantly more complicated.
The Oxford Dictionary has many definitions for “master”, and I believe a few of them are worth transcribing here:
1. chiefly historical - A man who has people working for him, especially servants or slaves:“he acceded to his master’s wishes”2. A man in charge of an organization or group, in particular:“they had to act according to the dictates of the political masters.”3. A skilled practitioner of a particular art or activity:“I’m a master of disguise”3.1 A great artist or musician:”follow in the footsteps of the masters and paint in locations made famous by their work”5.1 archaic A title for a man of high rank or learning.
There is an excellent article on attaining mastery over at Criver: The Journey from Novice to Master
By these definitions, many of us could be considered “Masters”, but it is something quite a bit more nebulous than that, I think. In the lifestyle, a Master must encompass all of the things listed above, but also must be more than that. I really love the Leather tradition of granting Coverings to those who have shown exemplary behavior, long service to the community, great effort expended in mastering their crafts and skills, proficiency in teaching and guiding others, helping to build and strengthen the community, etc. The title of Master is one that is not just granted because you’ve been in the lifestyle for forever, but because you have spent many years helping the community to grow and flourish, you’ve helped mentor and teach and guide many that have followed along the path, without ever forgetting that you are on the path as well.
The article I listed quotes Confucius: “I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand.” They utilize this while reminding us that mastery is not a static thing, that in order to remain a Master, one must be constantly working to better their skills in order to retain them. “Without constant practice, the slip from Master to Journeyman is all too easy.”
I also want to add here that there is a significant difference in this title as well between the Title and the honorific. You “own” a slave, and s/he refers to you as “master.” This is an honorific, and it exists as a part of your dynamic. I respect your dynamic, and what you call each other is entirely up to you, but unless you’ve gone through what I’ve listed above, I am not going to accord you that Title OR that honorific.
There have been several people that have referred to me as a “Master”, and for now, I’m afraid that I must respectfully decline the title. Have I put in the 10,000 hours? Arguably. I’ve been in the lifestyle for a long time, and the vast majority of that time has been spent eagerly learning everything that I can and putting it into practice as much as I can. I work each day to learn and grow, to better myself as a human, as a leader, as an Owner, and as a practitioner of several different forms of art.
But I don’t think that I’ve attained this title yet. I serve my community, I work for it. I’ve trained and taught and mentored, but I still don’t believe that I’ve attained Mastery. Perhaps one day, perhaps not. Until that day comes, I will not use this title outside of a dynamic.
Even there, I don’t accept that title willy nilly. This is a title I must earn, even within my dynamics. I work towards mastery every day, and regardless of the practical aspects of my relationship with my property, the decision is ultimately theirs when they wish to call me “master”.
Daddy -
Of the three titles I’m going to talk about, this one is the most personal and the most difficult to define. I am a “Daddy” type. Even though I can be cruel and strict and brutal and violent, underneath all of that, I am a Daddy. But it is such a deeply intimate part of who I am and what I am that it is also the place where I am the most vulnerable. It is the place where my heart is open, my armor no longer shields me, a place where I can be the most hurt.
So I require my property to earn the right to call me Daddy. It’s not a title that is simply chosen at random. It isn’t just something that gets me turned on and ready for fuck. While it is that, it is also something special.
But even then, that’s not always the case. There are special exceptions, people that I have in my life that I allow to call me Daddy, but the context is very different. I am “daddy” as an honorific, not as a Title. These are people that I love and trust, and they may be “baby-”, but they’re not MY “baby-”, just as I’m not their Daddy.
Outside of my personal life? I respect that not everyone has the same definition for what “daddy” means to them. But because of how deeply personal it is in my life, I also expect them to respect that I cannot and will not call THEM “daddy” or “mommy”. I’ll just stick with “Sir” or “Hey you.”